Court through take up to think

Court through take up to think, according to finding out of fact and evidence, be good enough to confirm Chiu is some to take betraying as a purpose, abduct, sell a child, its behavior has already constituted to turn to sell the child the offense.As for Chiu is some to debate to want to buy because the son dies of illness once a son say, through check, household register proof confirmation case hair Chiu Be some to have already raised one son, and its knowing perfectly welling what to be taken is the foreman is son, past it debates and finds out fact to not agree with.Moreover, it debates to use the parlance that 3000 dollars bought a sweet wood from together the case person, Zhang Mou Shou, didn,t correspond evidence support, not to adopt letter.
The our country penal code stipulates that sentencing to measure Xing to the person of accused should apply law for taking place criminal offence, therefore the court applied the law that takes effect in 1993 to make as above verdict.To this, Chiu is some to mean to have no an opinion, but deny to appeal to higher court "do not know", but sweet wood and its families all think to judge too lightly, "I hate bitterly person is trader.I am turned for 16 years, he judges for 6 years, I know how my own childhood led for none of these 16 years ……"however, for would not° until judge how many years be suitable, the sweet wood hesitates to say:"78 years!"